Page 1 of 1

How should Avesco score the points system

Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2005 11:35 am
by Julian Mayo
Comments, opinions and inflamatory statements welcome :lol:

Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2005 11:37 am
by rah
I liked the old system. Worked well for a long time.

Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2005 11:49 am
by Julian Mayo
rah wrote:I liked the old system. Worked well for a long time.
Which bloody one, :crush: :?

Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2005 12:03 pm
by rah
You know the one. Years ago, with the drivers, and the cars. How could you forget it?

Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2005 12:31 pm
by Julian Mayo
rah wrote:You know the one. Years ago, with the drivers, and the cars. How could you forget it?
Its one of the things I drink to forget, told you it was working :crush: :drink: :cheers:

Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2005 4:08 pm
by Southernman
I heard that there is going to be a change in points scoring next year. Can anyone confirm if that's true. :?:

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2005 9:33 am
by rah
Southernman wrote:I heard that there is going to be a change in points scoring next year. Can anyone confirm if that's true. :?:
News to me, I just hope they give more points for a win. Lowndsey should have taken it this year.

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2005 4:24 pm
by Southernman
According to the TVNZ website in the three race format, the winner of the first race will get 128 points, the winner of race two will get 64 points, and in the last race the winner will get 128 points. It does not say what the points are for other positions. :?

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2005 7:41 pm
by Julian Mayo
With the reverse grid format ? If the reverse grid format grid comes to fruition, it In my humbe opinion will be a result of pressure by the Holden Teams aftter the results this season. I would suggest that nothing is set in concrete. The cockroach may have grandiose plans, but it is a 2 car formula. If one side spits the dummy.........hmmmmmmmmm 8)

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 9:41 am
by Julian Mayo
If the 2005 championship had been run using the F1 points scoring system the results would have been:

Marcos Ambrose 60

Craig Lowndes 58

Tod Kelly 51

Rueell Ingall 47

Garth Tander 42.

Please direct all complaints to Tony Cochrone @ V8Supercars.

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 12:43 pm
by mlittle
Here's a suggestion as to how the V8's should allocate the points system....

1st(50), 2nd(46), 3rd(42), 4th(38), 5th(35), 6th(32), 7th(29), 8th(26), 9th(24), 10th(22), 11th(20), 12th(18), 13th(16), 14th(14), 15th(12), 16th(10), 17th-25th(9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, and 1 pt).

2 pts.-pole qualifier, 1 pt-2nd place starter(from top-10 shootout)
1 pt.-leading most laps
1 pt.-"hard charger" award(most improved positions from start-finish)


Each of the two constructors(Ford, Holden) would be the awarded the points from the highest finisher in each race.

For the two long events(Sandown and Bathurst), the points would go to both drivers, including any and all bonus pts. earned on-track

And, yes, after a certain point in the season, each driver could have their worst finish dropped from the points table. However, shouldn't the objective of any major series' points syatem be to reward a driver for both winning and consistency?

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:03 pm
by Julian Mayo
Sounds like Nascar scoring ! Nup, bugga consistancy, winner take all :lol:

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:42 pm
by mlittle
Point taken. :o :shock: :shock:

BTW, the points table I posted is close to what Trans-Am uses in its' racing series(sans' the drop worst result item).

Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2006 4:03 pm
by Julian Mayo
The Supercar Bosses, the teams and the new Broadcaster for '07 are examining the best points systems for next year