Page 5 of 56

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 4:35 pm
by Kapel
One of the most thrilling matches i've ever seen, Sadly someone had to lose :wink:

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 4:52 pm
by Julian Mayo
Still sulking :cry:

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 5:00 pm
by Kapel
julian mayo wrote:Still sulking :cry:
I can imagine mate... but u must admit that the batsmen screwed up & at 175/8 u dont expect the bowlers to do the batsman's job (usually this situation is common in Indian team :lol: )

I would say the momentum is still with the Aussie team.They must play Stuart McGill at Old trafford.The wicket will be flat & turn visciously from 5th session :wink:

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 5:49 pm
by Julian Mayo
Kapel wrote:
julian mayo wrote:Still sulking :cry:
I can imagine mate... but u must admit that the batsmen screwed up & at 175/8 u dont expect the bowlers to do the batsman's job (usually this situation is common in Indian team :lol: )

I would say the momentum is still with the Aussie team.They must play Stuart McGill at Old trafford.The wicket will be flat & turn visciously from 5th session :wink:

Mate, I was only having fun. It was a great game. The series would have been all over had Oz won. When your fast bowler top scores you don't deserve to win :cry: :beer:

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 7:09 pm
by Kapel
I so agree...

With McGrath missing & Gillispee outta form,its hurting Australia badly cos England have been putting on some big scores!!

i think its time for Katich also to take a miss :roll:

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 9:52 pm
by Julian Mayo
Kapel wrote:I so agree...

With McGrath missing & Gillispee outta form,its hurting Australia badly cos England have been putting on some big scores!!

i think its time for Katich also to take a miss :roll:
If pidgeon had been there the poms may have scored fewer runs, but so would Australia ! :lol:

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 10:15 pm
by Kapel
N so would Sachin Tendulkar :wink: :lol:

Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2005 9:33 am
by lemon_martini2
England 444 all out
Ozzie close of play 210/7

need 35 to avoid follow-on

Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2005 11:34 am
by Julian Mayo
lemon_martini2 wrote:England 444 all out
Ozzie close of play 210/7

need 35 to avoid follow-on
Hope they don't get it....some of the Oz players belong in a retirement home. It seems it is harder to get out of the team than it is to get into any other team. :evil:

Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 2:49 pm
by Bundy
read one of the most heartening quotes this morning fron Shaun Tait

"Sometimes you just need to hit a batsmen"
&
"Ever since I was young, every couple of games I've hit someone and hurt them so it's always been the way."


I love this bloke already!!!!

Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:14 pm
by Kapel
Yeah Bundy,nice one.I hope he's picked against a liability like Gillespie.

But guess what? Aussies lose a batsman in Gillespie,going by the series where Australian bowlers are making more runs than their top line batsmen :wink: (going India way are they? :lol: )

Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:30 pm
by Julian Mayo
Tait likes blood. Gillespie may still play.

Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:42 pm
by Kapel
julian mayo wrote:Tait likes blood. Gillespie may still play.
I'll b suprised if he did.I would rather play Stuart McGill in place of him.
But McGrath is gonna b fit to play too...Dunno where Gilli fits in

Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:51 pm
by Julian Mayo
Kapel wrote:
julian mayo wrote:Tait likes blood. Gillespie may still play.
I'll b suprised if he did.I would rather play Stuart McGill in place of him.
But McGrath is gonna b fit to play too...Dunno where Gilli fits in
If McGrath is out they may think the pitch suits Gillespie. He is still a good bowler, just trying too hard.

Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 4:04 pm
by Kapel
Gilli has been for me,the unsung hero for most of the success Australian test cricket have achieved.

But this time around,he's in the limelight(darklight) for lack of wickets & the england batsman picking him to demoralise the aus team.

Tait i feel would be under pressure in this crucial test & of what i know of trent bridge,it would be batsman's paradise.