Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 12:11 am
Only if your name is Alice.Julian Mayo wrote:Thought the looking glass might be a wise optionjacfan wrote:Maybe impossible to do without stirring up trouble. Gotta let it go.gkaytaz wrote:
Try me
Welcome to NewsOnF1 Forums where you can chat about anything Formula 1
https://newsonf1.net/forum/
Only if your name is Alice.Julian Mayo wrote:Thought the looking glass might be a wise optionjacfan wrote:Maybe impossible to do without stirring up trouble. Gotta let it go.gkaytaz wrote:
Try me
Well, I don't have a looking glass, but a WT stubby used the right way can bring things quit close, or make them seem a long way off......Caution, make sure the stubby is empty before raising it to one's eyejacfan wrote:Only if your name is Alice.Julian Mayo wrote:Thought the looking glass might be a wise optionjacfan wrote:Maybe impossible to do without stirring up trouble. Gotta let it go.
Quit close???Julian Mayo wrote:Well, I don't have a looking glass, but a WT stubby used the right way can bring things quit close, or make them seem a long way off......Caution, make sure the stubby is empty before raising it to one's eyejacfan wrote:Only if your name is Alice.Julian Mayo wrote:
Thought the looking glass might be a wise option
cross between squint and quitejacfan wrote:Quit close???Julian Mayo wrote:Well, I don't have a looking glass, but a WT stubby used the right way can bring things quit close, or make them seem a long way off......Caution, make sure the stubby is empty before raising it to one's eyejacfan wrote:Only if your name is Alice.
If one just recieved a good punch to the jaw, and was a tad cross-eyed would that read KO??jacfan wrote:OK.
As in keeping the distance?Julian Mayo wrote:Thought the looking glass might be a wise optionjacfan wrote:Maybe impossible to do without stirring up trouble. Gotta let it go.gkaytaz wrote:
Try me
Strictly technical: If you are the receiving party that'll read WTJulian Mayo wrote:If one just recieved a good punch to the jaw, and was a tad cross-eyed would that read KO??jacfan wrote:OK.
Technically?
JB is an impersonator.............so is that JD fella............wimpsgkaytaz wrote:Strictly technical: If you are the receiving party that'll read WTJulian Mayo wrote:If one just recieved a good punch to the jaw, and was a tad cross-eyed would that read KO??jacfan wrote:OK.
Technically?
And JW?Julian Mayo wrote:JB is an impersonator.............so is that JD fella............wimpsgkaytaz wrote:Strictly technical: If you are the receiving party that'll read WTJulian Mayo wrote:
If one just recieved a good punch to the jaw, and was a tad cross-eyed would that read KO??
Technically?
Looking at the results I say Nostradamus pulled your legjido wrote: Ayayaye!!!! Nostradamus says: the red horse follows the wicked tail! Stars are bright on the last day! Incidentally 'Ralf' stars are in line, luck is with him!
Obviously good ol' Nostra overlooked Heidfeld's antics! Except if these predictions were for another GP? (how could that be )gkaytaz wrote:Looking at the results I say Nostradamus pulled your legjido wrote: Ayayaye!!!! Nostradamus says: the red horse follows the wicked tail! Stars are bright on the last day! Incidentally 'Ralf' stars are in line, luck is with him!
I read that and thought you were referring to Jenson Button.Julian Mayo wrote:JB is an impersonator.............so is that JD fella............wimpsgkaytaz wrote:Strictly technical: If you are the receiving party that'll read WTJulian Mayo wrote:
If one just recieved a good punch to the jaw, and was a tad cross-eyed would that read KO??
Technically?
Nah, a far more important issuejacfan wrote:I read that and thought you were referring to Jenson Button.Julian Mayo wrote:JB is an impersonator.............so is that JD fella............wimpsgkaytaz wrote:
Strictly technical: If you are the receiving party that'll read WT