Page 2 of 5
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 1:12 am
by Ed
I don't see a reason for an agreement when there is clear reference in the regs.
But if you (or anyone else) finds more concrete evidence of such an agreement, please let us know.
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 7:07 am
by Julian Mayo
SGD, Im starting to get the idea that you dont care much for ferrari
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 7:33 am
by Ed
On the second and final day of testing this week at Mugello the F2005 driven by test driver Luca Badoer covered 107 laps with a quickest time of 1:21.575 ...
more
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 7:47 am
by Julian Mayo
Still seems slow, but a track temp of 16c would not help.
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 8:17 am
by sgd
julian mayo wrote:SGD, Im starting to get the idea that you dont care much for ferrari
You're right...
But just after 2004 it's hard to ignore them...
I'll have to focuys more in McLare and Renault (all my hope are in those 4 cars!!)
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 8:19 am
by sgd
Ed wrote:On the second and final day of testing this week at Mugello the F2005 driven by test driver Luca Badoer covered 107 laps with a quickest time of 1:21.575 ...
more
0.7 secs faster within a day!! not bad...
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 8:50 am
by JayVee
sgd wrote:I'll have to focuys more in McLare and Renault (all my hope are in those 4 cars!!)
That's a good
but why not Williams or BAR or even Sauber
Seriously, any of those 4 teams could challenge Ferrari given the Bridgestone tyres
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 8:52 am
by JayVee
sgd wrote:0.7 secs faster within a day!! not bad...
Still slow given the track temperature moved to 16 degrees which isn't too cold.
julian, 107 shakedown laps again ?
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 8:54 am
by Julian Mayo
all the talk about Bridgestones! I hope the bridgestones do perform. I want to see Schuey beaten fair n square, without excuses to hide behind
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 8:57 am
by Julian Mayo
Thats track temp, not air temp
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 8:59 am
by JayVee
for the tyres
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 9:01 am
by Julian Mayo
Yeah, I imagine they would be using compounds suitable for the european summer, and a road suface temp that low aint gunna maximise performance
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2005 10:27 am
by sgd
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2005 8:29 pm
by F1greyhound
just hacked into a message from the F1CIA:
"seems as......telemetrical data suggest.... a massive speed advantage of FERRARIs new F2005 car against the opposition, ......the gap being estimated around 1.2sec. Our agents..... have been already contacted by all major F1 event screening TV stations....... to make pressure on Mr. Mosley doing everything in his power................ to slow down FERRARI."
More rule changes to come?
Posted: Sat Mar 19, 2005 10:00 pm
by JayVee
