Save Minardi

Discuss all the aspects of the Formula 1 sport here

Moderators: cmlean, Ed, The Qualiflyer, The Heretic

GhoGho
F1 Race Winner
F1 Race Winner
Posts: 1054
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 10:34 pm
Location: 770

Post by GhoGho » Sat Sep 17, 2005 5:49 am

lemon_martini2 wrote:
GhoGho wrote:What difference will it make to the sport?
What about tyrrel, stewart, jaguar, lotus, arrows, jordan, ats, benneton, dallara, zakspeed, toleman, prost, lola, fondmetal to mane but a few?

all made their contribution and disappeared with no real consequences.
Not really---Tyrrell became BAR...Jaguar became Red Bull...Toleman became Benetton became Renault...

I wish they would increase the grid size so new teams would be able to come in to the sport rather than having to buy in if they did.Wouldn't it be great to have Jaguar AND Jordan AND Midland AND Sauber AND BMW on the grid?

And when you look at Minardi,you have to look at who else was round in their area of the grid when they began-little Continental teams like Coloni,Fondmetal,Osella,Zakspeed,Rial.Hardly any of them made it past the early 90s but Minardi managed to keep going for 20 years.
I agree that most of them became something else, like Minardi becoming Red Bull Something.
Unfortunately with the way things are now with money driving everything, particularly bernie and max, its surprising that these smaller teams have made it past the "golden era" of F1 where teams operated out of a backyard garage.
Maybe its time to say a sad goodbye to another small team that has recently only managed to help bring the number of cars on the grid to the required 20 and welcome someone who seems to be prepared to pump money into the team. Hopefully the team will grow stronger as have many of the others. With enough financial backing maybe the difference from front to back on the grid will get smaller and the racing more competitive.
We can only hope more wealthy people decide to get involved the way Red Bull has and then maybe we will see more teams and cars on the grid. (after the rules have been changed to allow more than 20)
I'm in shape

Round is a shape...........


:cheers:

Lloyd
F1 Tester
F1 Tester
Posts: 326
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 3:52 pm
Location: Pontification

Post by Lloyd » Sat Sep 17, 2005 6:02 pm

Minardi
The name has been there since I began to follow F1
It needs to be paid respect by Red Bull, its a Team name not a commercial product name. OK its now owned by red bull but imagine if they bought Ferrari and decided to change its name.
Honour the team that has always made the other teams feel fast
Long live Minardi
Maybe, perhaps, not sure

danilen1
F3 Tester
F3 Tester
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 6:36 am

Post by danilen1 » Sat Sep 17, 2005 11:18 pm

Lloyd wrote:Minardi
The name has been there since I began to follow F1
It needs to be paid respect by Red Bull, its a Team name not a commercial product name. OK its now owned by red bull but imagine if they bought Ferrari and decided to change its name.
Honour the team that has always made the other teams feel fast
Long live Minardi
hehe, well said. is the limit of cars on the grid, 20 as ghogho said? i thought 20 was the minimum and 24 the maximum??

Ed
NewsOnF1 Editor
NewsOnF1 Editor
Posts: 22255
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 1:24 pm

Post by Ed » Sun Sep 18, 2005 12:32 am

There is no maximum or minimun limit on the number of teams in Formula 1 however it is believed that the Concorde Agreement requires 20 cars on the grid and if there are less than 10 teams then one or more teams must supply 3 cars. (with the 3rd car not counted towards the championship)

The FIA Sporting regulations do have a provision for cancelling a race if fewer than 12 cars are available for it.

Post Reply